Canadian Association of Radiologists Cardiovascular Imaging Referral Guideline.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Cardiovascular Expert Panel is made up of physicians from the disciplines of radiology, cardiology, and emergency medicine, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 30 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 48 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 125 recommendation statements across the 30 scenarios (27 unique scenarios as 2 scenarios point to the CAR Thoracic Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline and the acute pericarditis subscenario is included under 2 main scenarios). This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for acute chest pain syndromes, chronic chest pain, cardiovascular screening and risk stratification, pericardial syndromes, intracardiac/pericardial mass, suspected valvular disease cardiomyopathy, aorta, venous thrombosis, and peripheral vascular disease.

High output cardiac state: evaluating the incidence, plausible etiologies and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The high output cardiac state (HOCS) [cardiac index (CI) >4 L/min/m2 ], primarily driven by abnormally low systemic vascular resistance (SVR), is a relatively under-recognized condition. Although, majority of these patients meet criteria for heart failure (HF), their treatment should be aimed at the primary pathology, as the majority of guideline directed HF therapies can reduce SVR further. OBJECTIVES: To characterize patients with HOCS and provide valuable insight into the condition. METHODS: Patients investigated by right heart catheterization (RHC) at the St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada between January 2009 and November 2021 were reviewed. Two groups of patients were included: 1) HOCS [CI >4 L/min/m2], and 2) pre-HOCS [CI between 3.8-4.0 L/min/m2]. Their medical records were reviewed to identify plausible etiologies, relevant investigations, and outcomes. RESULTS: 177/2950 (6 %) patients met criteria for inclusion: 144/177 (81 %) with HOCS [mean age 51 years (range 19 - 82); 67/144 (47 %) female] and 33/177 (19 %) with pre-HOCS [mean age 55 years (range 30 - 83); 6/33 (18 %) female]. The most common plausible etiologies for the HOCS included anemia (36 %), obesity (34 %), cirrhosis (17 %), and lung disease (32 %). Trans-thoracic echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging findings were non-specific and predominantly described preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and pulmonary hypertension. The population experienced high rates of hospitalization, and significantly high mortality [36/144 (25 %) of HOCS at a median follow-up of 31.5 months, and 13/33 (39 %) of pre-HOCS at a median follow-up of 17 months]. CONCLUSIONS: HOCS is not an uncommon condition and is associated with high mortality. Current HF guideline should incorporate such evaluation into the diagnostic criteria.

Antenatal diagnosis of bronchopulmonary sequestration: A case report and review of the literature.

Congenital lung malformations are a constellation of pathologies that can be diagnosed antenatally by ultrasound and fetal MRI. Ultrasound is considered the modality of choice for a routine assessment of second-trimester scans worldwide. Bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS) and congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) are the 2 most common echogenic chest masses discovered incidentally during routine ultrasound scans in the second trimester. This paper describes BPS and differentiates it from CPAM sonographically in utero. An extensive literature search involving antenatal ultrasound is undertaken to review the most up-to-date understanding of the BPS. Furthermore, a case study at our institution and the literature review will help better describe the salient features of BPS. A 41-year-old female G3P1 visits our department for a routine second-trimester ultrasound. An echogenic lesion with a cystic component is visualized in this scan. Based on the grayscale and color imaging, this complex echogenic lesion was reported as CPAM and was referred to fetal assessment for confirmation. The fetal assessment diagnosed the lesion as BPS because of the pathognomonic feeding vessel from the thoracic aorta. Regardless of the congenital lung mass, any large mass compromising fetal well-being is an indication for intervention. The prognosis of BPS in the absence of fetal hydrops is excellent. A robust collaboration among radiologists, obstetricians, and pediatricians is required for the best outcome for the pregnancy and the neonate.

CT perfusion for Assessment of poor Neurological outcome in Comatose Cardiac Arrest Patients (CANCCAP): protocol for a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac arrest remains one of the most common causes of death with the majority occurring outside of hospitals (out of hospital cardiac arrest). Despite advancements in resuscitation management, approximately 50% of comatose cardiac arrest patients (CCAP) will suffer a severe unsurvivable brain injury. To assess brain injury, a neurological examination is conducted, however, its reliability in predicting outcomes in the first days following cardiac arrest is limited. Non-contrast CT is the most employed scan to assess hypoxic changes, even though it is not sensitive to early hypoxic-ischaemic changes in the brain. CT perfusion (CTP) has shown high sensitivity and specificity in brain death patients, although its use in predicting poor neurological outcome in CCAP has not yet been explored. The purpose of this study is to validate CTP for predicting poor neurological outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS≥4) at hospital discharge in CCAP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CT Perfusion for Assessment of poor Neurological outcome in Comatose Cardiac Arrest Patients study is a prospective cohort study funded by the Manitoba Medical Research Foundation. Newly admitted CCAP receiving standard Targeted Temperature Management are eligible. Patients undergo a CTP at the same time as the admission standard of care head CT. Admission CTP findings will be compared with the reference standard of an accepted bedside clinical assessment at the time of admission. Deferred consent will be used. The primary outcome is a binary outcome of good neurological status, defined as mRs<4 or poor neurological status (mRs≥4) at hospital discharge. A total of 90 patients will be enrolled. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board. The findings from our study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at local rounds, national and international conferences. The public will be informed at the end of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04323020.

Volumetric Analysis of Renal Masses as Predictors of Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes.

Objective: To examine the role of endophytic tumor volume (TV) assessment (endophycity) on perioperative partial nephrectomy (PN) outcomes. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of 212 consecutive laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies from single institution using preoperative imaging and 1-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, RENAL nephrometry scores, and all peri- and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Volumetric analysis performed using imaging software, independently assessed by two blinded radiologists. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were completed to assess predictive value of endophycity for all clinically meaningful outcomes. Results: Among those undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS), lower tumor endophycity was associated with higher likelihood of trifecta outcome (negative surgical margin, <10% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, the absence of complications) irrespective of max tumor size. For MIS, estimated blood loss increased with greater tumor endophycity regardless of tumor size. Among those who underwent open partial nephrectomy, lower tumor endophycity was associated with trifecta outcomes for tumors >4 cm only. On multivariate analysis with log-scaled odds ratios (OR), tumor endophycity and total kidney volume had the strongest correlation with tumor-related complications (OR = 3.23, 2.66). The analysis identified that tumor endophycity and TV on imaging were inversely correlated with of trifecta outcomes (OR = 0.53 for both covariates). Conclusions: Volumetric assessment of tumor endophycity performed well in identifying PN outcomes. As automated imaging software improves, volumetric analysis may prove to be a useful adjunct in preoperative planning and patient counseling.

Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Musculoskeletal Findings on MRI and CT.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspeciality and general radiologists tasked with either adapting American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to meet the needs of Canadian radiologists or authoring new guidelines where appropriate. In this case, entirely new guidelines to deal with incidental musculoskeletal findings that may be encountered on thoracoabdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were drafted, focussing on which findings should prompt recommendations for further workup. These recommendations discuss how to deal with incidental marrow changes, focal bone lesions, abnormalities of the pubic symphysis and sacroiliac joints, fatty soft tissue masses, manifestations of renal osteodystrophy and finally discuss opportunistic osteoporosis evaluation.

Correlation of Impedance Cardiography-Derived and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Derived Stroke Volumes.

Cardiac output (CO) and other hemodynamic parameter measurements play an important role in the management of cardiovascular conditions; however, due to limitations of current day technologies, such measurements are either not routinely performed or incorporated into clinical practice. Moreover, measurement of these hemodynamic parameters in the outpatient setting at different time points to assess interval change is currently not feasible. We attempted to validate total-body impedance cardiography-based Non-Invasive Cardiac System (NICaS) derived stroke volume (SV) with that from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), a current day gold standard method of assessment. We compared SV, as it is the primary unit of measurement utilized by both technologies. Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing CMR were also investigated by NICaS following CMR. The consistency of non-invasive technology-derived SV measurement was validated by NICaS measurement in 10 subjects, both before and after CMR. Of the 41 enrolled patients; data from 38 patients was adequate for comparison (motion artifact prevented CMR measures in 3 patients). Fourteen patients (37%) were female; mean age was 55 ± 15 years (28-87 years) and body-mass index was 28.7 ± 5.5 kg/m2 (20.5-41.9 kg/m2). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (9/41) was the most common study indication for CMR. NICaS-derived SV strongly correlated with CMR [NICaS 77 ± 20 ml (31-123 ml) and CMR 84 ± 23 ml (47-132 ml); P < 0.001; r = 0.77; ICC = 0.73]. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement between NICaS and CMR were -26.7% and 39.9%. NICaS-derived SV collected before and after MRI did not differ [80 ± 18 ml (51-102 ml) pre and 76 ± 17 ml (50-99 ml) post; P = 0.0007, Kappa = 1]. Agreement between NICaS-derived and CMR-derived SV was within the acceptable range of boundaries set by the US Food and the Drug Administration. Consistency in SV measurement at different time-points may allow use of this technology to identify interval hemodynamic changes noninvasively.

An Update on Acute Mesenteric Ischemia.

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an uncommon yet highly lethal cause of acute abdomen in the emergency setting. Computed tomography (CT) imaging, in particular a biphasic protocol consisting of angiographic and venous phase scans, is widely used to corroborate non-specific clinical findings when suspicions of AMI are high. Techniques such as low kilovoltage peak scanning, dual energy acquisition, or a combined arterial/enteric phase can improve iodine conspicuity and evaluation of bowel enhancement. Biphasic CT with CT angiography is mandatory to directly assess for the 3 primary etiologies of AMI-arterial, venous, and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), and the CT angiographic findings may be the first visible in the disease. In addition, numerous non-vascular CT findings have also been reported. Bowel wall thickening, mesenteric stranding, and ascites are common but non-specific findings that correlate poorly with disease severity. Pneumatosis intestinalis and portomesenteric venous gas, while not pathognomonic for ischemia, are highly specific in cases of high clinical suspicion. Bowel wall hypoenhancement is an early and specific sign but requires a protocol optimizing iodine conspicuity to confidently identify. Finally, intraperitoneal free air and solid organ infarcts are also highly specific ancillary findings in AMI. AMI occurs as a complication in 10% of small bowel obstruction (SBO) patients, and understanding imaging findings of ischemia in the context of SBO is necessary to aid in treatment planning and reduce over- and under-diagnosis of strangulation. Familiarity with the imaging features of ischemia by radiologists is vital to establish an early diagnosis before irreversible necrosis occurs.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Prostate MRI White Paper.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy and the third most common cause of death in Canadian men. In light of evolving diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer and the increased use of MRI, which now includes its use in men prior to biopsy, the Canadian Association of Radiologists established a Prostate MRI Working Group to produce a white paper to provide recommendations on establishing and maintaining a Prostate MRI Programme in the context of the Canadian healthcare system. The recommendations, which are based on available scientific evidence and/or expert consensus, are intended to maintain quality in image acquisition, interpretation, reporting and targeted biopsy to ensure optimal patient care. The paper covers technique, reporting, quality assurance and targeted biopsy considerations and includes appendices detailing suggested reporting templates, quality assessment tools and sample image acquisition protocols relevant to the Canadian healthcare context.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.

Purpose: Iodinated contrast media is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after iodinated contrast administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow-up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations. Information sources: Published literature, including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports, along with expert opinions from radiologists and nephrologists across Canada. Methods: The leadership of the CAR formed a working group of radiologists and nephrologists with expertise in contrast administration and patient management related to contrast-associated AKI. We conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature to evaluate the evidence about contrast as a cause of AKI, and to inform evidence-based recommendations. Based on the available literature, the working group developed consensus recommendations. Key Findings: The working group developed 21 recommendations, on screening, choice of iodinated contrast media, prophylaxis, medication considerations, and post contrast administration management. The key changes from the 2012 guidelines were (1) Simplification of screening to a simple questionnaire, and not delaying emergent examinations due to a need for creatinine measurements (2) Prophylaxis considerations only for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3) Not recommending the routine discontinuation of any drugs to decrease risk of AKI, except metformin when eGFR is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and (4) Not requiring routine follow up serum creatinine measurements post iodinated contrast administration. Limitations: We did not conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment. Implications: Given the importance of iodinated contrast media use in diagnosis and management, and the low risk of AKI after contrast use, these guidelines aim to streamline the processes around iodinated contrast use in most clinical settings. As newer evidence arises that may change or add to the recommendations provided, the working group will revise these guidelines.

Justification: Les agents de contraste iodés (ACI) sont parmi les produits pharmaceutiques les plus fréquemment administrés. Au Canada, plus de 5,4 millions d'examens de tomodensitométrie (TDM) ont été réalisés en 2019, dont 50 % ont été faits avec un ACI. L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) survenant après l'administration d'un ACI était historiquement considérée comme une complication iatrogénique fréquente qui était prise en charge par le dépistage des patients, des stratégies prophylactiques et une évaluation de suivi de la fonction rénale. L'Association canadienne des radiologistes (CAR) a publié des lignes directrices pour la prévention de la néphropathie induite par les agents de contraste en 2007 et une mise à jour en 2012. De nouveaux développements sur le terrain ont toutefois mené à la disponibilité d'agents de contraste plus sécuritaires et à des changements dans la pratique clinique, ce qui a entraîné une révision complète des recommandations antérieures. Sources: La littérature publiée, y compris les essais cliniques, les séries de cohortes rétrospectives, les articles-synthèse et les rapports de cas, de même que les opinions d'experts de radiologistes et de néphrologues de partout au Canada. Méthodologie: La direction de la CAR a formé un groupe de travail composé de radiologues et de néphrologues ayant une expertise dans l'administration d'ACI et la gestion de patients atteints d'IRA survenant après l'administration d'un ACI. Le groupe a procédé à une revue complète de la littérature publiée afin d'évaluer les données probantes sur les ACI comme cause de l'IRA et de formuler des recommandations en fonction de celles-ci. Le groupe de travail a élaboré des recommandations consensuelles en se fondant sur la documentation disponible. Principaux résultats: Le groupe de travail a élaboré 21 recommandations sur le dépistage, le choix des agents de contraste iodés, la prophylaxie, les considérations relatives aux médicaments et la gestion post-administration de l'ACI. Les principaux changements par rapport aux lignes directrices de 2012 étaient : (1) de simplifier le dépistage à un simple questionnaire et de ne pas retarder les examens émergents en raison du besoin de mesurer la créatinine; (2) d'avoir des considérations prophylactiques uniquement pour les patients dont le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) est inférieur à 30 mL/min/1,73 m2; (3) de ne pas recommander l'arrêt des médicaments visant à réduire le risque d'IRA, comme c'est normalement le cas, sauf la metformine lorsque le DFGe est inférieur à 30 mL/min/1,73 m2 et; (4) ne pas demander de mesures de suivi de routine de la créatinine sérique après administration d'un agent de contraste iodé. Limites: Le groupe n'a pas procédé à une revue formelle et systématique de la littérature sur le sujet ni à une méta-analyse. Les suggestions n'ont pas été évaluées dans un environnement clinique. Conclusion: Compte tenu de l'importance des agents de contraste iodés dans le diagnostic et la prise en charge des patients, et du faible risque d'IRA encouru après leur administration, ces recommandations ne visent qu'à simplifier les processus relatifs à l'utilisation des ACI dans la plupart des milieux cliniques. Le groupe de travail révisera ces lignes directrices au fur et à mesure que des éléments de preuve plus récents seront ajoutés aux recommandations fournies.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast Associated Acute Kidney Injury.

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after ICM administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations. This revised guidance document was developed by a multidisciplinary CAR Working Group of radiologists and nephrologists, and summarizes changes in practice related to contrast administration, screening, and risk stratification since the last guideline. It reviews the scientific evidence for contrast associated AKI and provides consensus-based recommendations for its prevention and management in the Canadian healthcare context. This article is a joint publication in the Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal and Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, intended to inform both communities of practice.

Emergency Radiology: Evolution, Current Status, and Future Directions.

Emergency Radiology is a clinical practice and an academic discipline that has rapidly gained increasing global recognition among radiology and emergency/critical care departments and trauma services around the world. As with other subspecialties, Emergency Radiology practice has a unique scope and purpose and presents with its own unique challenges. There are several advantages of having a dedicated Emergency Radiology section, perhaps most important of which is the broad clinical skillset that Emergency Radiologists are known for. This multi-society paper, representing the views of Emergency Radiology societies in Canada and Europe, outlines several value-oriented contributions of Emergency Radiologists and briefly discusses the current state of Emergency Radiology as a subspecialty.

Recommendations for the Management of Incidental Pancreatic Findings in Adults by the Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists Incidental Findings Working Group consists of both academic subspecialty and general radiologists and is tasked with adapting and expanding upon the American College of Radiology incidental findings white papers to more closely apply to Canadian practice patterns, particularly more comprehensively dealing with the role of ultrasound and pursuing more cost-effective approaches to the workup of incidental findings without compromising patient care. Presented here are the 2021 Canadian guidelines for the management of pancreatic incidental findings. Topics covered include anatomic variants, fatty atrophy, pancreatic calcifications, ductal ectasia, and management of incidental pancreatic cysts.

Paraganglioma with highly malignant potential involving the rib - Case report and review of the literature.

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors arising from paraganglion cells in sympathetic or parasympathetic chains, which may develop in the abdomen, chest, skull base, and neck. As paragangliomas have a wide range of imaging features, the diagnosis often requires tissue sampling. We present a unique case of a paraganglioma which originally presented as a rib tumor. A 64-year-old male with right flank pain for 2 months' was referred for a noncontrast renal colic CT. He was found to have a 3.7 × 3.5 cm soft tissue mass invading the left posterior 9th rib and paraspinal muscle. This was fluorodeoxyglucose F 18, (18F-FDG) avid, with no other distant metabolic activity. He underwent ultrasound-guided core biopsy which revealed a diagnosis of paraganglioma. A right thoracotomy with chest wall resection of 8, 9, and 10 ribs were subsequently performed. The tumor was removed along with a small portion of adherent lung. The tumor was positive for CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin. S-100 highlighted occasional sustentacular cells, consistent with a pathologic diagnosis of a paraganglioma. The patient remains symptom free for 6 months' after the operation. Our case highlights that, when paragangliomas occur within the chest wall, they may present as a rib tumor and can mimic metastasis, myeloma or other primary neoplastic etiologies originating from ribs. Both imaging and pathologic diagnosis can be challenging.

Prevalence and Functional Implication of Silent Coronary Artery Disease in Marathon Runners Over 40 Years of Age: The MATCH-40 Study.

BACKGROUND: Marathon participation is becoming increasingly popular among individuals ≥40 years of age. Little is known about the prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD) and corresponding ischemia in this patient population. The study objectives are: (1) to characterize the prevalence of silent CAD in marathoners ≥ 40 years old using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCT); and (2) if subclinical CAD was detected, to determine the functional significance of occult lesions by stress echocardiography (SE). METHODS: Marathoners aged ≥ 40 years who completed a full marathon between 2018 and 2019 were recruited to undergo a prospective CCT. Coronary artery stenosis was graded as zero, mild (1%-49%), moderate (50%-69%), or severe (> 70%). All study participants diagnosed with mild-to-severe atherosclerotic CAD on CCT further underwent functional imaging with exercise treadmill SE. RESULTS: A total of 65 individuals (53 ± 7 years, 65% males, 24 ± 3 kg/m2) underwent a prospective CCT within 12 months of marathon completion. Of the total study population, 13 participants (20%) were diagnosed with CAD, of whom 10 (77%) had mild disease, 1 (8%) had moderate disease, and 2 (15%) had severe disease by CCT. Despite the identification of subclinical CAD on CCT, none of the 13 patients had any evidence of inducible ischemia on SE. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to incorporate both CCT and SE in the evaluation of subclinical CAD in marathoners ≥40 years old. Although the overall prevalence of anatomic CAD was 20%, there was no evidence of functional ischemia in this highly competitive cohort.

CONTEXTE: Les marathons ont gagné en popularité auprès des individus âgés de 40 ans ou plus. On en sait toutefois peu sur la prévalence de la coronaropathie subclinique et de l'ischémie qui lui est associée dans cette population de patients. L'étude visait à 1) caractériser la prévalence de la coronaropathie silencieuse chez les marathoniens âgés de 40 ans ou plus à l'aide d'une angiographie cardiaque par tomodensitométrie (ACTDM) si une coronaropathie subclinique était détectée, à déterminer l'importance fonctionnelle des lésions occultes par une échocardiographie d'effort (EE). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des marathoniens âgés de 40 ans ou plus ayant réalisé un marathon entre 2018 et 2019 ont été recrutés et soumis à une ACTDM prospective. Les sténoses des artères coronaires étaient classées selon une échelle allant de zéro, légère (1 à 49 %), modérée (50 à 69 %) à sévère (> 70 %). Tous les participants à l'étude ayant reçu un diagnostic de coronaropathie athéroscléreuse légère à sévère à la suite de l'ACTDM ont été soumis à une imagerie fonctionnelle avec EE sur tapis roulant. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 65 sujets (53 ± 7 ans, 65 % d'hommes, 24 ± 3 kg/m2) ont été soumis à une ACTDM prospective dans un délai de 12 mois à la suite de leur dernier marathon. Dans l'ensemble de la population à l'étude, 13 participants (20 %) ont reçu un diagnostic de coronaropathie; 10 (77 %) présentaient une maladie bénigne, 1 (8 %) présentait une maladie modérée et 2 (15 %) présentaient une maladie sévère selon l'ACTDM. Même si une coronaropathie subclinique a été diagnostiquée lors de l'ACTDM, aucun des 13 patients ne présentait de signe d'ischémie inductible à l'EE. CONCLUSIONS: Il s'agit de la première étude à utiliser l'ACTDM et l'EE pour évaluer la présence d'une coronaropathie chez des marathoniens âgés de 40 ou plus. Même si la prévalence globale de la coronaropathie anatomique était de 20 %, il n'y avait aucun signe d'ischémie fonctionnelle au sein de cette cohorte hautement compétitive.

Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion prostate biopsy with concurrent standard systematic ultrasound-guided biopsy among men requiring repeat biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion biopsy (FB) remains unclear in men with prior negative prostate biopsies. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of FB with concurrent systematic biopsy (SB) in patients requiring repeat prostate biopsies. METHODS: Patients with previous negative prostate biopsies requiring repeat biopsies were included. Those without suspicious lesions (≥Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 3) on MRI were excluded. All patients underwent FB followed by SB. The primary outcome was the sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7). The secondary objective was identification of potential predictive factors of biopsy performance. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included; 41 (77%) patients were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. FB had a higher detection rate of significant cancer compared to SB (85% vs. 76%, respectively, p=0.20) and lower diagnosis of indolent (Gleason score 3+3=6) cancer (10% vs. 27%, respectively, p=0.05). FB alone missed six (15%) clinically significant cancers, compared to 10 (24%) with SB. SB performance was significantly impaired in patients with anterior lesions and high prostate volumes (p<0.05). There was high degree of pathological discordance between the two approaches, with concordance seen in only 34% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior negative biopsies and ongoing suspicion for prostate cancer, a combined approach of FB with SB is needed for optimal detection and risk classification of clinically significant disease. Anterior tumors and large prostates were significant predictors of poor SB performance and an MRI-fusion alone approach in these settings could be considered.